Last week I posted Part 1 of the process of giving birth to a Coloured Pencil painting, and now we continue with Part 2.
That's how I look at the process actually, it's like giving birth to a child. A 'child' which has 'gestated' in my mind for sometimes considerable time before I ever set pencil to paper. The idea has to germinate in the fertile soil of a creative right-brain environment, before I can make the necessary decisions to actually commit the idea to the page. Sometimes of course an idea will ferment instead of germinate, or it might sit dormant for a long time and then suddenly it 'pops', and I know exactly what I want to do with it.
We left this particular painting at the 'finished draft' stage. The composition has been worked out, colour fields established, contrasts of value and colour and light have been roughed in. As I mentioned last week, I often set a painting aside at this point, for at least a few days, and then I pull it out again. This allows me to see any glaring inconsistencies while they're still relatively fixable.
Here is the finished draft, right where we left it last week, at the end of step 3.

I did hide this one away for a week or so, and when I came back to it I realized there was a problem with the balance of inside bridge width vs outside bridge width vs strip of background to the right of the bridge. The composition was basically split in half widthwise, with the contrast between the dark interior and lighter exterior and background being of equal width. Also, the strip of upright boards at the bridge entrance was basically the same width as the strip of landscape to the right. Not the greatest division of space. It immediately screamed out to me to 'fix it' !!
Step 4 ...

And so I 'fixed' it ... by the simplest of means - I cropped off a portion of the right-hand side. The painting ended up just a little narrower, but it now has a more pleasing visual balance, width-wise. I only removed a relatively narrow slice, but it was enough to make the difference it needed. Now the dark area inside the bridge is just a bit wider than the combined areas of the exterior bridge siding and background, and the background is slightly narrower than the bridge siding.
You can also tell I've done more work on developing all the colour areas, and started building some texture in the various areas. The dark areas have been deepened, and some blending has been done - mainly with a paper stomp. It's a good way to blend in the early stages, since it drives the colour particles into the paper and establishes a good base on which to build further layers.
Also note that in the finished draft, the top edge of the railing in the foreground pointed directly to the right front corner of the paper - I found this a little awkward and distracting, and the cropping fixed this area too. I actually exaggerated the line a bit more, and you can see now that the foremost section of the rail is actually a little wider than it was in the draft (step 3).
Light layers of coloured pencil can be erased quite well at this early stage, but after more layers are added it becomes increasingly difficult to remove the colour. Thus it is extremely important to 'plan ahead', and to catch any problem areas early on. This planning involves a certain amount of skill, which develops over time - ie: being able to 'look ahead' and see in my mind's eye what the piece will look like after more layers of colour have been added. How do I know what it will look like later? The simple answer is - years and years of practice and experimenting, and keeping accurate records of the various stages each painting goes through.
I call them my 'step-paintings', and I have scads and scads of these 'step-by-step' records in the computer, and many printed out as well, where they are displayed in their own portfolio. With that, if someone asks “how did you do that?” I can pull out the portfolio and actually show them. It's also a really good reference tool for me, as each new piece attempts to tackle some new challenge or limitation. Keeping a visual record of how I approached those challenges can make a future work more successful than if I'm constantly trying to 'reinvent the wheel'.
The close-up detail of the foreground grassy area shows how the organic shapes are gradually developed. At this stage it's still mainly just squiggles and overlapping loops and whorls done with the pencils, with a few staggered lines thrown in too. Darker areas of shadow in the grass have been suggested with a warm dark tone, bearing in mind that they are still not in full sunlight - as you can determine from the shadow area on the guardrail. There are still lots of light areas left to work with in the finishing stages. It's more important to 'suggest' the grassy forms, rather than to try to depict each blade and leaf etc. Let the viewer's eye 'fill in the gaps'.
Step 5 -
Now the spatial relationships have all been worked out, and adjusted where necessary. The colour pattern has been established. The value pattern is evident. Step 5 involved working on all areas of the painting, developing layers of colour, and areas of texture, and emphasizing value contrasts for best effect.
FINISHED PAINTING

Here is the final completed version, ready for framing. I think the best way to explain all the little details which were looked after in the finishing stages, is to show a few close-up details of various parts of the painting.
First, the primary focal point - the little vignette of background showing at 'the end of the tunnel' ... this passage has the sharpest contrast in values, from the dark interior of the bridge to the bright light tones of the background landscape. It's also the most interesting portion of the far edge of the marsh, with buildings and trees visible in greater concentration than you find in the background strip on the right side of the bridge. It's little tricks like these which help draw the eye to the center of interest.

MAXIMUM 8 TONS - focal point detail ...
Next we see a close-up view of an assortment of textures ... from the weathered boards on the bridge exterior, to the rough concrete support in the lower right, to the semi-smooth metal of the guardrail ... then there's the smooth reflections on the water surface, the coarse vegetation growing by the water's edge ... as the distance increases the details decrease, so you don't really see much texture in the background or in the far field - just patches and bands of forms and colours.

MAXIMUM 8 TONS - detail of textures
And finally, here's a view of the roadbed and the grass and other plants growing beside it. The rough texture of the road bed was developed much in the same way as the grassy area - random squiggles and overlapping loops of colour. Here again it's a matter of 'suggesting' the texture, rather than trying to depict every little stone and pebble.
Close observation pays off in building up these important details. If necessary, just sit and stare at the area in real life for awhile, let your mind absorb the nuances of light and shadow which create the textures.
This ability to first observe the area in real life is one of the main reasons I only use my own photos as reference. If you haven't actually been to the spot, you will not have the chance to absorb these little nuggets of visual information, and you will be restricted to just what you can see in the photo. And photos are not always as accurate or detailed as we would like them to be.
The final stage in finishing this painting is to go over it with a fine-tooth-comb, so to speak, and make sure that all passages are adequately blended, to create that 'painterly' look and feel which distinguish them from 'just a drawing'.
No, I'm wrong - the actual 'final' stage, after all this checking and blending has been done, is to apply a coating of spray fixative. Actually, I'm still wrong - the real 'final' stage for me is to scan the image into my computer records.
So there you have it. This particular painting was started on March 15, the final draft was completed on March 21, it was then set aside for 2 weeks. Step 4 was completed between April 8 – 14, step 5 between Apr 14 – 16. Then it was set aside for a few more days, and the final adjustments and blending in step 6 were carried out between April 20 – 24. Just short of 6 weeks from start to finish. Total time - approximately 30 hours. That's relatively average for this type of work, but some paintings can take far longer. Some paintings I've actually timed have logged as much as 80 – 100 hours, and I'm sure there have been some which have taken even longer than that. Lately though I find the total time actually seems to be decreasing as I gain more experience and understanding of this very versatile and fabulous medium.
I'd love to hear your comments on this painting, or on the process of creating it. The labour pains were well worth the final result. It is, after all, one of my 'babies', and I'm quite happy to share it with the world. I gestated it, birthed it, nurtured it, watched it grow and develop, and now I have the pleasure of seeing what it has become. What more could a parent want !!
And now it's on to the next one :) Because after all, as any artist can attest, 'the next painting will be my best ever'.
* * *